View Print Friendly Version | Close Window

CEPI - Commonwealth Educational Policy Institute
Legislation - Finance / Operation

David Blount, Editor

Funding and the Standards of Quality (SOQs)

Recent Virginia Legislation History

While much of the legislative action affecting Standards of Quality (SOQ) funding occurs through the state budget, there have been some recent legislative changes (and proposed changes) affecting the SOQ that are worthy of note. In 1999, the General Assembly amended 22.1 – 253.13:3 (through HB 2122) to incorporate in the Code the staffing ratios set forth in the Regulations Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (Standards of Accreditation, or SOA). While these regulatory standards already were recognized by the state funding formulae, the legislature, rather than the Board of Education, now has control over these provisions. Also in 1999, HB 1673 amended 22.1–253.13:1 to lower the divisionwide pupil/teacher ratios from 25:1 to 24:1 in kindergarten (with a maximum class size of 29) and grades two and three (with a maximum class size of 30). The same ratio already existed for grade one. There was minimal fiscal impact associated with this measure and it widely was viewed as legislative recognition of local school division practice. Bills the past several years to amend the SOQ to require elementary school guidance counselors garnered General Assembly approval on several occasions, only to be vetoed. Though the disagreements on these bills were largely philosophical, this additional requirement would have driven more SOQ funding.


Future Study Resolutions or Likely Legislative Activity

The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) is examining state and local funding of public education during 2000–2001, with an interim report due in December and a final report due next August. This study is focusing on local discretionary spending on education in excess of that required by the Standards of Quality. It will examine, among other things, the SOQ cost methodology and state and local funding of those costs, and will look at specific local practices that exceed the SOQ and to what extent the practices used relate to local ability to pay. The study also will study local capital and debt service costs. Ultimately, JLARC may recommend options that are available to the General Assembly should it wish to enhance state support for K-12 education by funding certain practices that exceed the current SOQ.

The Commission on Educational Accountability, established in 1999, is charged, among other things, with recommending ways to increase the capacity of schools, teachers, and students to meet the high academic standards posed by the Standards of Learning (SOL) and SOA. A special task force of the Commission was established to examine the impact of the SOA on local budgets, including study of current funding levels and fiscal capacity and demographics of school divisions. The 2000-2002 budget also requires the Board of Education to calculate the costs of implementing and complying with the SOA. The results of these studies could drive further budgetary recommendations or proposed changes to the SOQ.

Finally, it is significant to note unsuccessful attempts made during recent sessions to increase SOQ requirements, which would increase funding obligations for both the state and localities. Measures were proposed to increase the number of required assistant principal positions in local schools, to increase the number of required instructional positions/1,000students and to further lower prescribed pupil/teacher ratios and maximum class sizes (from 18:1 to 15:1, and from 22 to 20 maximum class size) for grades K-3 in certain schools. Also, earlier in the 1990s, the legislature considered, but did not enact, various bills that would have allowed the Local Composite Index (LCI), the formula-driven ability-to-pay indicator, to be appealed at the state level.

 

Specific Virginia Bill Cites

1998 – HB 303, HB 416, HB 427, HB 434, HB 685, HB 686, SB 205

1999 – HB 235, HB 1673, HB 1768, HB 1975, HB 2122

2000 – HB 131, HB 1358, SB 164, HB 1032

 

Other States Legislative Activity

As noted in the Funding and the Standards of Quality issue briefing, changes to states’ education funding systems have been realized largely as a result of court rulings against the school finance system. Those states and the decisions can be found at www.coe.ilstu.edu.

 

Sources, Cites, Links

Regulations Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia, July 2000.

Briefing by JLARC staff on the Study on Funding for Elementary and Secondary Education, June, 2000.

 

Policy Issues

Click here for a policy issue briefing on “Funding and the Standards of Quality (SOQs).”

 

E-mail Response

Click cepi@vcu.edu to provide comments or additional information. Please indicate in an e-mail the copyright source and contact information for new inclusions.

Back to Top

Copyright © CEPI 2000
CEPI grants permission to reproduce this paper for noncommercial purposes if CEPI is credited.

 

 

View Print Friendly Version| Close Window